For a chimpanzee, one good turn deserves another

Study set-up © MPI for Evolutionary Anthropology

Chimpanzees cooperate with each other in various ways but the underlying motivation of these behaviours is not always clear. For this reason, the Max Planck researchers focused on the psychological factors that might explain cooperation in chimpanzees.

In a series of behavioural studies the chimpanzee subjects' access to food was blocked and had to be released – either by the assistance of a conspecific partner or without the partners help. The chimpanzees could then choose between two options: one that provided food to both the subject and their partner and one that only provided food to the subject.

The results were very clear: chimpanzees preferably chose to provide food to both themselves and their partner – but only if it was the partner that had made this choice possible. The animals were particularly generous if their partners had risked obtaining no food for themselves at all by providing their assistance.

This behaviour confirms game theory models on social cooperation previously researched at the Max Planck Institute for Mathematics in the Sciences that had provided the impetus for this behavioural study collaboration.

Material rewards are considered a key component of human cooperation. The results of the current study show that, under certain conditions, chimpanzees are as willing as humans to show their gratitude to their conspecifics even when costs are involved.

“What surprised us most was that the chimpanzees even gave up extra food to reward a conspecific's support. This contradicts the common assumption that chimpanzees only care for themselves as soon as a chance for more food is involved,” says Martin Schmelz, one of the study’s authors. It appears that the animals can even assess the magnitude of the reward their partner has earned: the more the latter has risked, the greater the willingness to offer a commensurate reward.

Rewarding prosocial behaviour

“The findings suggest that the chimpanzees take into account not only the actions of their test partners but also their cooperative intentions, and that they can differentiate truly prosocial behaviour from potentially self-serving acts,” says Sebastian Grüneisen, another of the study’s authors. “They also show that the animals integrate recent single events into decisions, even if this puts them initially at a material disadvantage.”

Hence, chimpanzees might engage in a kind of “emotional bookkeeping” and make emotionally-based social decisions. It is possible that they want to reciprocate their partner’s willingness to cooperate and to signal their desire to establish social ties. This assumption is consistent with the finding that chimpanzees have higher levels of oxytocin – a hormone involved in the formation of social ties – in their blood when they cooperate with conspecifics. Further studies on chimpanzees and on the potentially even more social bonobos could confirm these findings.

Study set-up (see picture):

(A) Starting point: From the perspective of the subject, the partner can decide between option A, in which the partner alone obtains food, and option B/C, in which the partner leaves the distribution of the food up to the subject and risks not getting anything.

(B) End point: The partner chose option B/C. The subject rewards this favour by choosing option C, in which both animals obtain food.

Original Publication:

Martin Schmelz, Sebastian Grüneisen, Alihan Kabalak, Jürgen Jost, Michael Tomasello
Chimpanzees return favors at a personal cost
PNAS; 20 June, 2017

Contact:

Dr. Martin Schmelz 

Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig 

Phone.: +43 670 608 2099

Email: martin.schmelz@gmx.net 



Dr. Sebastian Grüneisen 

Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig 

Phone: +49 341 3550 462 

Email: sebastian_grueneisen@eva.mpg.de

Prof. Dr. Jürgen Jost
Max Planck Institute for Mathematics in the Sciences
Phone: +49 341 9959 552
Email: juergen.jost@mis.mpg.de

Jana Gregor
Press and Public Relations
Max Planck Institute for Mathematics in the Sciences
Phone: +49 341 9959 650
Email: jgregor@mis.mpg.de

http://www.eva.mpg.de
http://www.mis.mpg.de

Media Contact

Jana Gregor Max-Planck-Institut für Mathematik in den Naturwissenschaften (MPIMIS)

All latest news from the category: Life Sciences and Chemistry

Articles and reports from the Life Sciences and chemistry area deal with applied and basic research into modern biology, chemistry and human medicine.

Valuable information can be found on a range of life sciences fields including bacteriology, biochemistry, bionics, bioinformatics, biophysics, biotechnology, genetics, geobotany, human biology, marine biology, microbiology, molecular biology, cellular biology, zoology, bioinorganic chemistry, microchemistry and environmental chemistry.

Back to home

Comments (0)

Write a comment

Newest articles

A new puzzle piece for string theory research

Dr. Ksenia Fedosova from the Cluster of Excellence Mathematics Münster, along with an international research team, has proven a conjecture in string theory that physicists had proposed regarding certain equations….

Climate change can cause stress in herring larvae

The occurrence of multiple stressors undermines the acclimatisation strategies of juvenile herring: If larvae are exposed to several stress factors at the same time, their ability to respond to these…

Soil ecosystem more resilient when land managed sustainably

Compared to intensive land use, sustainable land use allows better control of underground herbivores and soil microbes. As a result, the soil ecosystem is more resilient and better protected from…