Scientists link common immune cell to failure of checkpoint inhibitors in lung cancer

Microscope image of a lung cancer tumor of a patient who responded to checkpoint inhibitors. T cells (in blue) were able to mount an anti-cancer response, and neutrophils (in purple) are not widespread in the tumor. Credit: Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

For many lung cancer patients, the best treatment options involve checkpoint inhibitors. These drugs unleash a patient's immune system against their disease and can yield dramatic results, even in advanced cancers.

But checkpoint inhibitors come with a huge caveat: They only help a small subset of patients. Doctors struggle to predict who these patients are and — just as important — who they aren't.

Results from a new study published Dec. 19 in the journal JCI Insight could help improve those forecasts.

After analyzing tumor samples from 28 patients with non-small cell lung cancer, researchers linked a common immune cell with treatment failure. The culprit: neutrophils, the most abundant type of white blood cell.

The paper shows that the balance between neutrophils and another type of immune cell — disease-fighting T cells — could accurately predict which patients would respond or not. If more neutrophils than T cells were crowded into a tumor, the drugs did not curb the patients' cancers. But if the balance was reversed, checkpoint inhibitors revved up patients' immune systems against their disease.

“The study is the first to implicate neutrophils in the failure of checkpoint inhibitors,” said senior author Dr. McGarry Houghton, a lung cancer immunologist at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center. “Our findings also hint at a way to help patients who have this cellular signature.”

In a mouse model of NSCLC, the researchers administered a drug that decreased the number of neutrophils in and around tumors. That in turn boosted the efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors — T cells now had a clear path to attack diseased cells in the mice. The researchers now want to test this approach in NSCLC patients through a clinical trial.

“As the immunotherapy field has evolved, the main question has become: Can you identify people who will respond to these treatments?” Houghton said. “But here we're really interested in identifying the 80% of people who don't respond and finding new ways to help them.”

Neutrophils are the most common white blood cell in the human body, which churns out billions of them a day. They play a vital role in the immune system, serving as first responders after infection or injury.

Early cancer researchers didn't think they played a role in the disease, Houghton said. “Cancer is a chronic disease, so people didn't think they would be very important because they don't live very long. How could they influence cancer if they're only living a few hours?”

Today, researchers know that some neutrophils can suppress the activity of T cells. And even if individual neutrophils are short-lived, collectively they can secrete chemical messages over a long timeframe. While the new paper doesn't explore precisely how neutrophils are interfering with the checkpoint inhibitors, Houghton said, the link is clear.

“This ratio of neutrophils and T cells accurately tells you who's going to respond or not,” he said. “As far as we know, this is the first time anybody has shown neutrophils contribute to (checkpoint inhibitor) treatment failure.”

The researchers hope that knowledge could translate to better outcomes in patients. Houghton plans to launch a clinical trial combining the neutrophil-blocking drug with checkpoint inhibitors as part of the Fred Hutch Lung Specialized Project of Research Excellence.

And they will continue to search for markers that can predict whether immunotherapy is likely to help a given patient. Being able to sort patients by their cellular signature could help doctors pick the right treatment and avoid toxicities in people unlikely to benefit from the drug, Houghton said.

“This idea of personalized immunotherapy isn't here yet,” Houghton said. “But knowing which of these subtypes a patient falls into would, in the future, allow for more targeted studies and treatments. We're trying to take steps in that direction.”

###

This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (R01CA223191 and P50CA228944) and the Seattle Translational Tumor Research program.

Media Contact

Molly McElroy
mwmcelro@fredhutch.org
206-667-6651

 @FredHutch

http://www.fredhutch.org 

All latest news from the category: Life Sciences and Chemistry

Articles and reports from the Life Sciences and chemistry area deal with applied and basic research into modern biology, chemistry and human medicine.

Valuable information can be found on a range of life sciences fields including bacteriology, biochemistry, bionics, bioinformatics, biophysics, biotechnology, genetics, geobotany, human biology, marine biology, microbiology, molecular biology, cellular biology, zoology, bioinorganic chemistry, microchemistry and environmental chemistry.

Back to home

Comments (0)

Write a comment

Newest articles

A new puzzle piece for string theory research

Dr. Ksenia Fedosova from the Cluster of Excellence Mathematics Münster, along with an international research team, has proven a conjecture in string theory that physicists had proposed regarding certain equations….

Climate change can cause stress in herring larvae

The occurrence of multiple stressors undermines the acclimatisation strategies of juvenile herring: If larvae are exposed to several stress factors at the same time, their ability to respond to these…

Making high-yielding rice affordable and sustainable

Plant biologists show how two genes work together to trigger embryo formation in rice. Rice is a staple food crop for more than half the world’s population, but most farmers…