Ensuring accuracy in 3D-printed jet engine parts

With $750,000 in NASA funding, engineers work to mitigate and prevent defects in additively manufactured metal parts designed for use in extreme environments.

In additive manufacturing, also known as 3D printing, a 3D printer deposits material onto a surface or mold, letting it solidify one layer at a time until a 3D object – as simple as a plastic cube or as complex as a metal jet engine component – takes shape.

Unlike subtractive manufacturing, which involves carving an object out of a larger piece of material, additive manufacturing uses only the amount of material necessary to create a part. This reduces waste and lowers cost, making it especially attractive for prototyping purposes. It also enables users to easily create parts with complex shapes.

Precision and quality are key in additive manufacturing, especially when it is being used to create heat-resistant metal parts for applications such as jet engines, rockets or other high temperature environments. A team of two University of Arizona engineers is using machine learning methods and $750,000 in NASA funding to monitor and mitigate defects that occur in additive manufacturing. Mohammed Shafae of systems and industrial engineering(link is external) and Andrew Wessman of materials science and engineering(link is external) are collaborating with Lockheed Martin Space, Open Additive LLC and CompuTherm LLC.

“Andrew and Mohammed are using their combined backgrounds in materials science and systems engineering to look at additive manufacturing from a microscopic level all the way up to the large-scale systems level,” said David W. Hahn, Craig M. Berge Dean of the College of Engineering. “Advanced manufacturing is one of the college’s research focus areas, and this is a great example of an interdisciplinary effort to advance the field and keep the UA at the forefront.”

Different Defects, Different Problems

There are two broad categories of defects that can occur in additively manufactured products.

Process defects are physically visible aberrations that occur when something goes wrong in the printing process. For example, two layers may not stick together properly, or there could be a hole or crack in the material.

Material defects are variations in chemistry or the arrangement of atoms that are not visible except with high resolution microscopes. The complexity of many additively manufactured parts can make it difficult to find these defects using common inspection methods. Material defects may happen if one layer is still cooling, and another hot layer is placed on top of it. The temperature of the first layer could rise, and the change in the cooling process might alter the part’s properties. For example, the metal could become brittle, or less able to endure strain.

“You can think how dangerous that would be if the part were used in a jet engine or a rocket.” Shafae said. “The types of defects we’re focused on are defects that will make the material behave differently than intended.”

Machine Learning and the Fourth Industrial Revolution

Shafae and Wessman will be using a sophisticated sensor system, combined with thermal imaging cameras and high-speed localized cameras, to monitor the 3D printing process and identify when and where defects occur. They’ll apply machine learning methods to the data and develop a model that can predict defects when they occur. This will allow scientists to take corrective action to prevent the defects or terminate a process before wasting more time and materials. Research in this area typically uses a single type of sensor to detect specific categories of defects, but this work takes the concept a step further.

“We’re really going to try to learn how these separate categories of defects can be linked to each other, because sometimes the process defects can be the leading cause of the material defects,” Shafae said.

The machine learning element of this project is key: A product is only as strong as its weakest point, and industrial-scale additive manufacturing processes often generate several terabytes of data no single researcher could sort through. Taking that step out of human hands allows for a much closer analysis of the process.

This combination of augmented intelligence with the fusion of digital, physical and biological worlds forms the cornerstone of the University of Arizona’s strategic plan. The project’s combination of data processing, process optimization, materials analysis and machine learning makes it an excellent representation of the Fourth Industrial Revolution.

“This is truly an example of what people need to be doing to get to Industry 4.0, which is basically the use of data to improve processes, and ensure they are performing as you want them to,” Wessman said. “By improving manufacturing process quality, you can know what you have is a good product from the time you take it out of the machine.”

Media Contact

Emily Dieckman
University of Arizona College of Engineering
edieckman@email.arizona.edu
Office: 520-621-1992
Cell: 760-981-8808

www.arizona.edu